Here they are, all in one place…
Jon
The “cloud” has come to mean the storing and accessing of data (including programs) over the internet rather than on on our device (computer, phone or otherwise). The official definition of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology is: “Cloud computing is a model for enabling convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of […] Read More
Let me start this in a perhaps unusual place. John Perry Barlow passed away on February 7 2017 at the age of 70. He was many things and could easily be nominated for any list of the most interesting, charismatic, and thoughtful people in recent memory. He possessed instant street cred for having been a lyricist for the Grateful Dead, but there was much more. He was a visionary, spokesman, and poet for the early internet. Most of all he was a protector of of the web’s potential. He was a founder of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and famously the author of “A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace”…
This week’s Question of The Week comes directly from Charlotte’s presentation last week, but Barlow’s life-work provides an interesting backdrop to answering it in the context of interests worth protecting. Perhaps this excerpt from Cindy Cohn’s announcement on the EFF’s website of Barlow’s passing captures it best:
“Barlow was sometimes held up as a straw man for a kind of naive techno-utopianism that believed that the Internet could solve all of humanity’s problems without causing any more. As someone who spent the past 27 years working with him at EFF, I can say that nothing could be further from the truth. Barlow knew that new technology could create and empower evil as much as it could create and empower good. He made a conscious decision to focus on the latter: “I knew it’s also true that a good way to invent the future is to predict it. So I predicted Utopia, hoping to give Liberty a running start before the laws of Moore and Metcalfe delivered up what Ed Snowden now correctly calls ‘turn-key totalitarianism.’”
So without further ado, here is the Question of the Week…
Sorry, there are no polls available at the moment.If you need to remind yourself of the various possibilities and their contexts, scroll down to the Week 6 slides and take a bit of time to reacquaint yourself with Charlotte’s
Jon
P.S. If you are interested in more on Barlow an excellent Obituary from The Guardian and Cindy Cohn’s announcement can both be found below…
The following article aligns with our discussion of using AI technology to create deep fakes. However, this article identifies an experiment conducted by a group of University of Chicago researchers. The experiment involves using computer algorithms to create fake Yelp restaurant evaluations. The researchers used a machine-learning technique known as deep learning to analyze letter and word patterns used in millions of existing Yelp reviews. Usually when there are mass postings of fake reviews, for example when Hilary Clinton’s book was launched, websites are able to identify it. However, with the researchers’ use of AI, Yelp’s filtering software had difficulty spotting many of the fakes. Even human test subjects were unable to tell the difference between real and fake reviews.
The researchers wanted to conduct this experiment in order to see whether it was possible for individuals to make fake reviews on a mass level in order to impact people’s use of a product, book, restaurant or anything else. This interest displays how things focused on in the media like “fake news” or “deep fakes” really can impact the research and developments in the communication field.
For now, the approach to create fake critics remains to be “crowdturfing” where mass amounts of people are paid to comment on websites. “In crowdturfing online reviews, an attacker creates a project on the Mechanical Turk site and offers to pay large numbers of people to set up accounts on Amazon, Yelp, TripAdvisor or other sites and to then post reviews intended to either raise or sink a product or service’s money-making prospects”.
From here the researchers plan on looking at ways to detect fake news – currently its difficult to create fake news with AI because computers cannot generate the “human touch” in articles however if AI can create fake reviews – anything is possible.
ARTICLE: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/could-ai-be-the-future-of-fake-news-and-product-reviews/
MEDIA, COMMUNICATIONS & NET NEUTRALITY
DIGITAL
CREATIVITY
SURVEILLANCE & PRIVACY
GAMES
Jon
MEDIA, COMMUNICATIONS & NET NEUTRALITY
DIGITAL
CREATIVITY
SURVEILLANCE & PRIVACY
GAMES
Jon
This article was interesting in light of what we’ve been discussing in class:
The article is just quoting “a source with knowledge” of some conversation between Trudeau and Sheryl Sandberg, and then goes on to say that neither Facebook or the PM’s office would comment on this, but putting aside the irony of an article about fake news that is essentially based on one anonymous source, it seems that the highest levels of Canadian government are at least considering some kind of social media regulation.
I also thought it was interesting that the title of the article references “stricter regulation” even though there doesn’t seem to be any sort of Canadian government regulation of Facebook at this point, particularly in regards to the kind of news content it allows on the site, and the article doesn’t go on to explain what, if anything, it is referencing with that wording in the title. It may have just been an oversight/error, or maybe they were thinking of regulations in a much broader sense, beyond the scope of communications law and site content, but it could also be that people just sometimes assume that there is some kind of regulation in place already in these situations, because it seems to strange to think that there wouldn’t be anything stopping these social media giants from profiting by basically turning a blind eye to propaganda.
In response to a recent post by Stephanie concerning findings on mobile carriers stifling certain apps and content, I am posting an article I recently read concerning Facebook and Google’s dominance on Ads. More often than not one will be searching something on googling and on Facebook an advertisement referring to the searched item will be present. The ability for Google and Facebook to do this is purely genius on their part and it connects back to the discussion we had on the ability for companies to increase their revenue by using their own users for feedback on what they want to watch/see and in this case assisting other companies to capitalize on that with ad space on these websites. Last year alone Google garnered (including YouTube) garnered $35.00 billion in total digital ad dollars in the US, up 18.9% over 2016!
AND if you are really paranoid about Facebook’s ability to look at your previous searches and reflect that in advertisements on their site ( EVEN THOUGH THEY ALLEGEDLY DENY DOING THIS) , the below article gives you a step by step guide on how to eliminate their ability to do this – logging out is not enough and there is no way to complete eliminate it but there are steps you can take to protect yourself.
https://lifehacker.com/5843969/facebook-is-tracking-your-every-move-on-the-web-heres-how-to-stop-it
Other articles:
Check out this article for more stats: https://www.emarketer.com/Article/Google-Facebook-Tighten-Grip-on-US-Digital-Ad-Market/1016494
This article… https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/04/cowen-facebook-vs-google-digital-ad-business.html also addresses Google’s leadership in digital Ads but it was stated last month that Facebook is expected to increase its share thanks to the growth of Instagram and video ads.
Tomorrow I will talk in my class presentation about whether and how social media should be regulated. Some of the most important concerns in this area revolve around the issues of free speech, democracy and censorship. A number of European countries have debated and enacted certain provisions which go some way to ‘regulating’ or ‘censoring’ social media posts. Have a read of these 2 articles (one about Ireland and one about Germany); they serve as interesting comparisons to the legal landscape in Canada. The core of the presentation tomorrow will consider whether it is appropriate for governments or for individual social media companies to decide what may and may not be posted on social media platforms, or whether there might be an alternative and/or hybrid route to answering this difficult question.
A social media watchdog in Ireland? https://www.siliconrepublic.com/enterprise/digital-safety-commissioner-social-media-watchdog-ireland
Censorship in Germany? https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-01-03/welcome-to-2018-the-year-of-censored-social-media
Stumbled across this article regarding a new app that analyzes data on how mobile carriers stifle certain apps/content/etc. An interesting read and video!
https://news.vice.com/en_ca/article/8xd4dg/are-mobile-carriers-already-violating-net-neutrality